Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stijn Pel vs Deney Wassermann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pel vs Wassermann analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Stijn Pel vs Deney Wassermann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pel 0 - 0 Wassermann
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pel has won 48.45% of points on their second serve, while Wassermann has won 52.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pel, in recent form, has won 45.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wassermann has won 50.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.75% and 34.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pel has saved 60.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wassermann has saved 60.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pel has won 53.06% of matches played (W/L 26/ 23), with Wassermann winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 28/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 74/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Pel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 23), where as Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pel has played against opponents with an average rank of 60.39 while Wassermann has played against players with an average rank of 166.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pel has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wassermann has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pel has converted 32.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wassermann has converted 37.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
775
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
Form
54% (58-49)
Career Total W/L
59% (105-72)
35% (6-11)
YTD W/L
60% (12-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Stijn Pel vs Deney Wassermann For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pel VS Wassermann
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Pel VS Wassermann H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stijn Pel | Deney Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (6/11) | 60% (12/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (15/21) | 59% (26/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (162/186) | 54% (227/194) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 67% (8/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 71 | 73 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:52 | 1:48:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 139.29 | 154.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (696/1115) | 55% (740/1337) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (457/696) | 72% (535/740) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (203/419) | 52% (312/597) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (35/108) | 37% (56/151) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (382/1066) | 40% (544/1357) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 35% (6/11) | 60% (12/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 71% (12/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Stijn Pel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mikail Alimli
Player
Stijn Pel
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
50 of
106)
6
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
11
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
111
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ognjen Milic
Player
Stijn Pel
45%
(
40 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Gschwendtner
Player
Stijn Pel
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Stijn Pel
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Stijn Pel
85%
(
53 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Pel
Player
Liova Ajavon
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Alec Deckers
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Mikail Alimli
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
8
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Deney Wassermann
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Pel Vs Wassermann Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Pel are available here and Wassermann photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Deney Wassermann
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
